ALL the News about
Mormons, Mormonism
and the LDS Church
Mormon News: All the News about Mormons, Mormonism and the LDS Church
Posted 01 Apr 2001   For week ended March 30, 2001
Most Recent Week
Front Page
Churchwide
Local News
Arts & Entertainment
·Bestsellers
·New Products
People
Sports
·Statistics
Politics
Internet
·New Websites
Events
Business
·Mormon Stock Index
Letters to Editor
Search
 
Archives
Continuing Coverage of:
Boston Temple
School Prayer
Julie on MTV
Robert Elmer Kleasen
About Mormon News
News by E-Mail
Weekly Summary
Participating
Submitting News
Submitting Press Releases
Volunteer Positions
Bad Link?

News about Mormons, Mormonism,
and the LDS Church

Sent on Mormon-News: 29Mar01

By Kent Larsen

Census Arguments Made, But Panel Raises Doubts About Counting LDS Missionaries

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH -- A three judge panel in Salt Lake City heard arguments Wednesday from the state of Utah, the US Census Bureau and the state of North Carolina over the count of overseas US citizens in the 2000 census. But the court made clear that it was not inclined to include LDS missionaries in the count. And while Utah then argued that federal employees living abroad should then also not be included in the census, the Bureau and North Carolina vigorously disagreed.

Utah began its arguments by claiming that LDS missionaries should be included in the count, suggesting that the Bureau count "similarly situated groups" in addition to federal employees. But the panel's chief judge, Stephen H. Anderson, a justice on the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, quickly cut off the claim. "Unless you persuade me otherwise, the only option is to include LDS missionaries or exclude federal employees . . . There is no conceivable way to go beyond the LDS group, " Anderson said. He went on to add that including only LDS missionaries was not fair, "Including only missionaries would not advance the cause of equal representation." He also rejected Utah's claim that leaving overseas LDS missionaries out of the census violated the "equal protection" doctrine, saying that those arguments were undeveloped and criticized the state's failure to define "similarly situated groups," "It's like you're saying 'We don't know what [the definition of 'similarly situated groups'] is. You figure out what it is.' "

When Anderson rejected Utah's main argument, the state's lead attorney, BYU Professor Tom Lee, shifted to arguments that the overseas federal employees included in the census should also not have been counted. "The question is whether the Census Bureau acted lawfully by counting only a narrow segment of all Americans living overseas. . . . only those who happen to work for the federal government." This argument was more successful with Lee claiming "The Census Bureau is trying to have it both ways. They're saying that counting federal employees enhances the overall count, but what's good for the goose is good for the gander." He says this argument gives the Bureau "unfettered discretion to include the groups it wants to include."

Panel Judge Dee Benson, a US District Judge in Salt Lake City, was sympathetic to this argument, asking why the Bureau hadn't done more to count other US citizens overseas. "Isn't that what they do? They're not strangers to difficult counts. I don't see anything in the record where the Census Bureau has made a serious attempt to reach similarly situated people."

But Rupa Bhattacharyya, Commerce Department attorney representing the Census Bureau claimed that the Bureau was taking such steps, but hadn't been able to implement reforms for the 2000 census. She said that federal employees were included not only because they could be accurately counted, but also because they conform to a uniform standard and are working overseas at the federal government's order -- they don't have a choice. This point, that they are overseas at the federal government's order, was the reason that the US Supreme Court upheld counting them in its 1992 ruling in Franklin vs. Massachusetts.

Bhattacharyya also said that including LDS missionaries, even though they can be accurately counted, would appear to favor one state over the others. In order to include other groups a reasonable standard needs to be in place, "If you count those groups that can provide reliable records, where will you break it off? There are businesses, churches and schools that all keep good records. But how will you get a representation that is not skewed?"

Sources:

Missionary Count Looks Shaky
Salt Lake Tribune 29Mar01 T1
By Joe Baird: Salt Lake Tribune

Utah census quest called unrealistic
Deseret News 28Mar01 T1

Court may reject Utah census bid
Ogden UT Standard-Examiner 29Mar01 T1
By Bob Ward: Standard-Examiner Capitol Bureau

Judges Hear Utah's Census Plea
New York Times (AP) 28Mar01 T1
By Paul Foy: Associated Press


QUOTE:

[an error occurred while processing this directive]


Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Kent Larsen · Privacy Information